Joe Pyrah is on to some things.
But what about the assessment that Utah won't go too far right?
I can't claim to be any expert on the moods and attitudes of Utah. Still, it seems to me that Utah is not necessarily what it appears on the surface.
Look at what Marxists might call the objective situation: General Motors nationalized! The banks cowed and cowering. The health system next.
I'll just mention Iran and North Korea having/working on nuclear weapons.
So the situation, from a conservative point of view, is desperate, tea parties or not.
So is Bob Bennett a guy for such a time?
Forgive the martial metaphor, but in the military there's a time for desk generals and a time for fighting generals. Grant, Sherman, Patton, Billy Mitchell -- these guys are just trouble in peace time, and what good are they then? But in war time ...
If you don't like martial metaphors, think of the difference between entrepreneurs and managers, or inventors and technicians.
So is a "peacetime" senator right for the times?
Conservatives would say no. They might say -- so what good is dickering in D.C? So the government only owns 65 percent of GM rather than 70 would be significant? Big deal!
Hard to say what's going on, in Utah or nationally. Or whether it can get 50 percent of the vote.
Still, are we in one of those watershed times? And can Bennett or other standard-issue Republicans survive?
But, however, can Shurtleff or others beat him? Can't beat something with nothing.